Performance Based Pay for SEO

by Shimon Sandler on October 22, 2006

I’ve been hearing more and more about Pay-for-Performance for SEO Consultants.

Although, many an SEO Consultant I’ve spoken with, have a problem with the performance based compensation model. The reason is because the client is asking the SEO to take the all risks. Especially for a new website to rank well in a competitive vertical. That can take a lot of time & investment. So, the idea is…why not challenge an SEO Consultant, and not assume any risk/investmest yourself?

Many SEO Consultants will not entertain the thought of this payment model for a millisecond. However, if they do, here are a few pay-for-performance SEO business models.

1) No upfront or monthly payments. Pay per lead, per sale or % from profit.

2) Small monthly fee. And, Pay per lead, per sale or % from profit.

3) SEO Consultant charges a one-time minimal fee for the initial SEO Optimization then only gets paid when the Top 5 positions are achieved. In this model, the SEO Consultant gets paid when the Keyword(s) rank in the SERP’s in a specific position.

For example: Pay an initial ( one-time) fee of $1000. Then, pay the SEO Consultant on Search Engine Rankings for specific keywords.
$125.00 per month for position #5.
$250 per month for position #4.
$500 per month for position #3.
$1000 per month for position #2.
$2000 per month for position #1.

There can be a list of many keywords, and the cumulative pay, might be more than expected. A real win-win situation for both parties.

To allieviate the unbalanced risk that the SEO Consultant takes, he can charge a low monthly fee in addition to the performance incentive. Of course these are just examples, and the actual amounts will vary per SEO Consultant.

Postscript:
Another idea is for Pricing to be a specific amount (eg: $0.15) for each “unique visitor” to the website. A Web Analytics summary report should be provided at the end of each month.

Share and Enjoy:
  • StumbleUpon
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Propeller
  • TwitThis

No related posts.

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

Mike, The Internet Guy October 22, 2006 at

For an e-commerce site you could also do try a percentage of revenue model. I would also suggest a minium payment in this scenario as well

Reply

avi October 23, 2006 at

I think it depends on the client.

For example, today I went to a sales call for a small brick and mortar women’s fashion boutique. A mom and pop, with a small e-commerce store. I walked in with the option of taking a % of sales or a flat rate hourly model.

I decided to go with a flat rate hourly model for SEO and SEM training. I can’t forsee this driving the numbers to covermy expenses – on a pay per performance basis. Even if the online business doubles this year, it still wont generate enough for a pay per performance rev model.

Reply

Caleb October 23, 2006 at

I’ve always wondered if the various seo companies could actually deliver on some of the claims they make. Perhaps, a pay-per-performance model will finally give some of them a chance to prove it.

Only then can we, as their potential clients,make a decent decision on whether to go that route or not.

Reply

Jure November 28, 2006 at

As a customer I would prefer model #1. My SEO budget is very low but I am prepared to share 30% of the sales income. But I must say that I didnt had any luck finding SEO to do pay per performance.
Please contact me if you know a company to work like that.

Reply

JP January 15, 2007 at

Hey Shimon,

Have you used a PFP SEO business model?

I would love give an example.

I’m having trouble measuring my client’s leads, traffic, and sales.

Warmly,

JP

Reply

Damion March 26, 2007 at

My best clients are ones that I work on a performance basis. I have only done this with two clients, though… and both had two common traits:

1) Both we’re currently using PPC to drive traffic, and we’re having SUCCESS

2) Both we’re referred to me from a close website designer friend of mine.

Otherwise I wouldn’t do it.

But the setup is perfect.

For example… one client was spending an average of 55 cents per click. Rather than charging a flat rate, or monthly rate, I madethsi offer:

I take all of the risk… IF I deliver no results – you pay me nothing. If i did deliver, I recieved 45 cents per click.

There are sever pro’s to this for bot hparties. For the client:

– he gets marketing on a performance model – something that is extremely rare.

– he already knows that added traffic equals more revenue and profits.

– he’s getting it cheaper than he already pays for it

– the benefits of Organic traffic over PPC traffic.

For me, it was an obvious one – If I deliver, I’ve built a residual source of income from my labors. Which always makes sense. It was actually part of my presentation. Why should he continue to get the benefits of the ranking/traffic, and I only get paid a one time fee?

This has worked very well for me over the past 3 years. With one client, we’ve just recently switched to a per lead/percentage of gross (whichever is higher). Since I know I can drastically increase the conversion rates of his visitors into actions… this was a logical way to increase my revenue with him – while maintaining the performance basis of our relationship.

Of course… there is a lot of trackability and trust that is needed to make it work. I wouldn’t offer it to Joe Blow who was referred to me from somewhere else…. but for the right client it can be a beautiful setup.

Hope this helps!

Damion

Reply

Leave a Comment

*

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: